Hi,
For search engine optimization we decided to display images from an url that is stored In the database, instead of images generated by WB.
My question is, would it be better to use absolute urls like "www.img.mydomain/img12234.jpg" or would it be better to use relative urls like "images/img12234.jpg".
For an absolute url I feel that there would be (a little?) more overhead because of the dns lookup/httprequest and I suppose for a relative url perhaps there's not. Am I right in this assumption?
And if there's a difference, would it be significant, especially when many images (about 50) are displayed?
Best regards,
Piet
For search engine optimization we decided to display images from an url that is stored In the database, instead of images generated by WB.
My question is, would it be better to use absolute urls like "www.img.mydomain/img12234.jpg" or would it be better to use relative urls like "images/img12234.jpg".
For an absolute url I feel that there would be (a little?) more overhead because of the dns lookup/httprequest and I suppose for a relative url perhaps there's not. Am I right in this assumption?
And if there's a difference, would it be significant, especially when many images (about 50) are displayed?
Best regards,
Piet